Showing posts with label Coffee Party. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Coffee Party. Show all posts

Friday, January 18, 2013

Conn Grats!!

No Bracketed Excla(y)mations! But...
NO LABELS (all caps) BREAKING NEWS!

Seriously, there will be time enough to (fill in the blank) later.

But there is news on the Divided Government Front,
as well as the DFA,
or now AFA conn trast.
Bud ump bump.

Speakin of Scale or CAPS n' FONTS[!]
[reference dig or unM-bed of touchstone in today's NPR]
We have Try-furnation of the Bi-Cameral,
or N(for)nation of the Bifurcation.  

Tuesday, November 06, 2012

Anac(R)onism? Election Day!

Hump Day ?

[Post-date Re: De-Calf ]
[pardon the M-b/ed/s ! ? ]

2012 General Election Endorsements


YES

  • Referrendum 74 (marriage equality)

  • Initiative 502 (legalize+tax marijuana)

  • Advisory vote #1 (ESB6635 - close bank tax loophole)

  • Advisory vote #2 (SHB2590 - keep tank safety fee)

  • King County Prop. #1 (renew fingerprint ID funding)

  • Mercer Island Fire Station Bond
NO

  • Initiative 1185 (Tim Eyman's 1/3 rule)

  • Initiative 1240 (defund public schools)

  • SJR 8221 (clamp debt limit; stick it to local govt.)

  • SJR 8223 (allow UW/WSU speculative

Wednesday, April 06, 2011

Post Roads and

Going Postal,

By George, "This isn't a budget, this is a cause!"



This isn't the internet this is a post road.



[This is a test.]
[Not of original intent.]
[The test will follow.]
[7-6-11 link added]

Sunday, December 05, 2010

Re: Leads

Cat 'o 9 Tales V. Who let the dogs out!
This is a perfect follow up to the Mis Leeds.[*] Stop.
[I will begin at the end, which is very hard for a work in progress...or should I start at the top? Not? Leadership or Bottom Lines for the People? As for timing, Mis Leeds preceded Re: Leads. I will skip a story[*] in getting to the Leadership issue, many[*] actually[*], but I have covered now the Re: Leads and will now MoveOn to the Top Line(secondary leed) which was noted* on a page of a resolution as it was debated in its proper 4M. Speaking of Cap Locks, I wasn't, but my fingers do the talking and so does $M(**) sometimes. This could be a flip of the free press, or the Buck in media? Remembering this is a work in progress, and also anachronistic, or is nothing contemporary? Just what was the Resolution? To give Obama courage! There were touching speeches. So(now) I get to the top from the bottom. Go Tatupu!!!!!! Now that is current. Waterbirds(brackets/italics) aside...(The Seahawks just took the lead.) And by Jiminy they are playing the Panthers. Who knew? But back to the issue of cats. They are hard to hurd.. Democrats are a big tent, but there are at least two kinds of dawgs.[yellow and blue(**)] We may need to whip up our courage and yet the(whoo trip)the big picture(touchdown) takes a brush of the artists pallet[e]. Woof, woof!]
* literally sitting in the reorg meeting, before the resolution was passed and a suspension of the rules failed to amend it, I noted a rough form of these words, actually exactly but for the o'.[close enough for journalist work?]
{typo edit ed: who knows jack}
[** capitalization effect 4M= 4'em but $M= buck media and not 4us.]
Postgame W(R)ap: Tale of Two Haves?(PI) From down 0-14 to finishing 31-14 the Nader has been passed ***.
*** A Resolution Calling for Courage and Leadership now from President Obama and Democratic leadership in the House and Senate.
[updates 12-9-10]
[*] link added and other editing [1-17-12 embedded in his 12-9-10 update C-(sic) "ledes" is correct spelling sometimes punned as Mis-leads.]
[(**)] in editing I have added a few hints and corrected some grammar/punctuation, but I will note that I was blogging with the Seahawks game on, and should note speaking of color, the passing of Don Meredith, quarter back & color commentator. As a personal aside it feels kind of funny to have been in a class with Tatupu's dad.
{note 3rd [*] Tails Aside already updated note Presidential Cheer Leaders and the pun on Tails and Tales.}

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Lemon or Orange?

Or Green*? Why vote?
Ralph Nader asks: Why say yes to the party of no? The answer is, one shouldn't.

*"At the risk of being obvious..." began my letter to the editor, but I guess I went underboard.
Horsey's cartoon goes overboard on voters
At the risk of being obvious, I would like to comment on David Horsey's "Red & Blue America" (May 19). For the sake of humor, it went overboard in its characterizations of those who voted for George W. Bush or Al Gore. I hope it is a good thing if people realize, like I did, how we can see one side funnier or less overboard than the other.
I hope the humor can be less dividing than the colors pinned on Gore and Bush. It also made me realize that there may be value in using more colors, but somehow without Green or any other color being a factor in making us see red.**
[Please note the bold "Green or any other" was struck by the editor, apparently not obvious enough that Nader was the Green party, (and green)the almighty buck and envy. And these days if you need a Tea Party pallet, just smear the colors and brown with hints of purple works nicely.]


** if you want more anger and debt don't vote
[Speaking of info wars]

Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Nuance

Inserted.
New Aunts.
Just a Position
Ground Zero
[BTW: Massachusetts is the home of Dunkin' Donuts. And I have yet to listen to the complete Position above, but it is kind of funny that Dave Johnson[@40 minutes] follows a Coffee Partier.(around 22 minutes)]
[Not to mention earlier parties.]
[Meanwhile][As well as...]